AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
I’d pay per major version or do the IntelliJ perpetual fallback if it came to it, but I’ve never once been bait and switched (looking at you Tower2). ![]() I paid them $50, probably 6 years ago now, and have never been forced to pay them another dime. I forgot to mention their license is still a lifetime license. A great combination of simple just get out of the way and advanced automation strategies. The Teams version, which requires a monthly sub kinda/sorta mimics a git style branch strategy for merging different members changes and handles the team problem pretty well.Īll in all though, it is absolutely and BY FAR the best request tool I’ve ever used. paw file is binary and doesn’t do well checked into source control if you’ve got more than one person using it. This could very well be my lack of knowledge, though I feel like I know the tool well. vREST - REST API Testing Tool: Automated REST API testing tool. Yet Another REST Client: Easy to use REST API that lets you develop, test and debug. Talend API Tester - Free Edition: Allows interaction with REST, SOAP and other HTTP APIs. Each request requires the auth config, but this is solved by just copying an existing request and starting from that. Postman Interceptor: Newest extension from the REST testing legend. I still can’t figure out how to make it “use the same auth scheme” for every single request globally. I’ve only got really a couple of nits with the stand-alone version. ![]() The API client maintains a history of API calls so you can go back to the requests. ![]() It supports HTTP as well as our newest UIs for GraphQL, gRPC, and WebSocket. Most importantly, it just works, and it works well and quickly, with pretty much any auth scheme I’ve ever had to deal with. In place of the Scratch Pad, we are excited to launch a brand-new lightweight API client that is designed for single users who just want to make quick API calls through the Postman UI. You can extract values from one response body to use as a variable in another request, the built in features go on and on- and there’s a decent extension ecosystem/write your own. It can generate code snippets and cURL requests. It can consume swagger/openapi docs and generate calls. One of the most delicate features of Firecamp is the ability to test WebSockets and GraphQL in addition to standard REST APIs. I’ve been using it for a long time and I’d happily pay $100 for it.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |